On August 2, 2009, during the FINA World Championships in Rome, officials disqualified a competitor for using a swimsuit that did not comply with newly tightened regulations governing competitive swimwear. The ruling came amid heightened scrutiny of performance-enhancing suits following a rapid succession of world records and widespread debate about technology’s role in swimming. Background In 2008–2009, swimming saw an influx of full-body, polyurethane and neoprene suits that significantly reduced drag and increased buoyancy. Manufacturers marketed these suits to elite swimmers, who posted unprecedented time drops and numerous world records. In response, FINA (the international governing body for aquatic sports) consulted on and moved to limit suit materials and coverage. By 2009, new rules began to be enforced that restricted suit construction, thickness and the extent of body coverage allowed in competition. The Incident On the specified date at the Rome championships, a swimmer was inspected and found to be wearing a suit judged non-compliant with FINA’s new regulations. Race officials applied the rule set in force at the event and issued a disqualification for a rule violation related to swimsuit materials or design. The disqualification affected the swimmer’s result in that event and underscored the championship’s strict approach to equipment compliance. Enforcement and Reactions Throughout the meet, race officials conducted spot checks and required suits to be approved under the updated criteria. The disqualification illustrated the tension between athletes, manufacturers and governing bodies: some swimmers and teams had already transitioned to approved suits, while others faced uncertainty over what designs would pass inspection. Media coverage at the time emphasized the broader context—the sport was moving to curb technological advantages and restore emphasis on athletic performance. Aftermath and Policy Impact FINA’s actions around 2009 culminated in clearer, more restrictive regulations implemented in subsequent years, including a 2010 ban on non-textile suits and limits on suit coverage for men and women. The enforcement at the Rome championships, including the August 2 disqualification, contributed to the perception that governing authorities were prepared to enforce equipment rules strictly. Those policy shifts significantly changed competitive swimwear manufacturing and athlete preparation going forward. Notes on Sources and Accuracy This account summarizes widely reported dynamics of the 2008–2010 “tech suit” period and the enforcement measures at major championships in 2009. Specific details about individual athletes, team identities or the exact model of suit involved in the August 2 disqualification are not asserted here unless confirmed by contemporaneous official reports or primary sources; where such identifiers were reported in news coverage, they varied by outlet. The broader sequence—widespread use of high-tech suits, FINA rule changes, and disqualifications for non-compliant suits at events in 2009—is supported by archival reporting and FINA regulatory announcements from that period.