On June 4, 2007, law enforcement arrested a sports referee in connection with an investigation into an alleged illegal gambling operation. Media accounts from the period reported that the referee was suspected of either running or participating in a network that facilitated illegal wagers, including bets on sporting events. The arrest came after a broader probe by local or federal authorities into organized sports betting activity. Reporting at the time emphasized that charges and the precise role of the referee differed across jurisdictions and outlets. In some cases the referee faced charges related to running an unlawful gambling enterprise; in others, the individual was accused of placing bets or acting as a middleman. Publicly available information from contemporaneous news coverage and court records should be consulted for the definitive list of charges and any subsequent legal outcomes, including arraignment, trial, plea, or dismissal. Police statements and court documents typically framed such investigations around concerns that illegal gambling can undermine the integrity of sports, facilitate money laundering, and be linked to other criminal enterprises. Investigators frequently use undercover stings, wiretaps, financial records, and cooperation from informants to build cases against alleged organizers and participants. Journalists covering the June 2007 arrest noted uncertainty on a number of points: whether the referee’s conduct affected the outcome of any games, whether other sports figures were involved, and the final disposition of the charges. In at least one similar case from the era, defendants reached plea agreements or faced trial; however, outcomes vary and must be verified against court dockets for this specific individual. The arrest attracted attention because referees occupy positions of authority and impartiality in competitive sports, so allegations of involvement in illegal gambling tend to provoke scrutiny from leagues, governing bodies, and the public. Sports organizations often conduct their own reviews and can impose disciplinary measures independent of criminal proceedings. Because contemporary reporting sometimes used shorthand or speculative language about the scope of alleged gambling rings, researchers and readers should rely on primary sources—official police reports, indictments, and court records—to confirm exact charges, dates, and legal resolutions. Local newspaper archives and public court databases from June 2007 are the most reliable avenues for verification. This summary avoids conjecture about the referee’s guilt or innocence beyond the reported arrest and alleged connections to illegal wagering. For a complete legal and factual picture, consult the jurisdiction’s court filings and reputable contemporaneous news coverage.