On November 19, 2010, media reports from Colombia and international outlets described an extraordinary case: a man who had sustained dozens of stab wounds reportedly walked to a hospital where he sought treatment. Accounts at the time said the victim had been attacked and carried multiple knife wounds; some reports gave the number as 67. The case was widely shared in news stories and later circulated online as an example of extreme survival and the human body's resistance to trauma. Context and reporting Contemporary news coverage came from local Colombian outlets and international news services summarizing local police and hospital statements. Initial articles emphasized the large number of wounds and the shock this number prompted among readers and commentators. As with many fast-breaking or sensational reports, details varied between sources: some cited police counts, others referenced hospital staff descriptions. Independent medical verification beyond the statements recorded in those reports appears limited in publicly available archives. Medical plausibility and interpretation Medically, survival after multiple stab wounds depends on many factors: wound depth and location, whether major blood vessels or organs were damaged, promptness of medical care, and the victim’s overall health. Superficially numerous wounds can be less life-threatening if they avoid major structures; conversely, a single wound to a vital organ can be fatal. Walking to a hospital after severe injury is uncommon but possible in cases where immediate collapse does not occur. Why the story spread The combination of a large numeric claim (67 wounds), the dramatic image of an injured person making their way to care, and the human-interest angle made the story highly shareable. Viral circulation was aided by the way some outlets repeated the figure without extensive caveats, and by social media resharing. Over time, variations and embellishments appeared in retellings, as often happens with widely circulated reports. Uncertainties and limitations Publicly available sources from the time rely primarily on initial statements from police and hospital representatives reported by journalists. I could not find extensive peer-reviewed medical analysis or later official documentation publicly released that fully corroborates every detail of the early reports. The exact number of stab wounds, the assailant(s), motives, and long-term outcome for the victim are details that appear inconsistently across accounts. Where sources conflict or lack verification, readers should treat specific numeric claims with caution. Legacy and lessons The incident illustrated several broader points: the variability of trauma outcomes depending on wound location and medical response; the role of media in amplifying dramatic claims; and the importance of cautious reporting during crises. It remains an oft-cited example in discussions about survivability after penetrating injuries, but it should be framed as a remarkable individual case rather than evidence of generalizable outcomes. Sources and verification This summary is based on contemporaneous news reporting from November 2010 and later retrospective discussions summarizing those reports. Because detailed primary medical records and comprehensive official documentation are not publicly available, some elements of the initial reports cannot be independently verified here. Readers seeking primary-source documentation should consult archived local news coverage from Colombia and any official statements released by medical or law enforcement authorities from that time.